U.S. Issues Warning Over Zambia’s New Cybersecurity Law Amid Surveillance Concerns

Edited by : Widad WAHBI

The United States has issued a formal warning to its citizens regarding a new cybersecurity law in Zambia, raising serious concerns over privacy, surveillance, and freedom of expression. According to a notice released by the U.S. Embassy in Lusaka, the legislation—quietly signed into law on April 8 by President Hakainde Hichilema—grants Zambian authorities the power to monitor and intercept all digital communications within the country, including calls, emails, text messages, and streaming content.

The embassy warned that the law defines “sensitive information” so broadly that it could apply to nearly any form of digital communication, placing not just political dissidents but all residents—Zambians and foreigners alike—under potential scrutiny. The message urged Americans living in or traveling to Zambia to “carefully assess the implications of this law and adapt accordingly.”

In its response, the Zambian Ministry of Foreign Affairs insisted the law is not designed to infringe on privacy, and that any surveillance measures require a court order. Officials stated that the purpose of the law is to combat cyber fraud, online child exploitation, and misinformation, emphasizing that mass surveillance is neither authorized nor intended.

Despite these assurances, many Zambians remain unconvinced. The sudden establishment of a cybersecurity unit within the president’s office and the absence of public consultation have amplified suspicions that the law could be used to target critics of the government, especially ahead of the upcoming general elections.

Free press advocate Joan Chirwa described the law as “a sad day for Zambia,” warning that its reach goes far beyond journalists and activists. “It will affect everyone,” she said, citing fears that the government is edging closer to digital authoritarianism.

The law gives broad enforcement powers to authorities, allowing them—under a search warrant—to enter any premises and seize computers or systems believed to contain criminal evidence or content obtained illegally. It also empowers the government to extradite Zambians accused of offenses under the law. Depending on the offense, penalties include fines or imprisonment ranging from five to fifteen years. Telecommunication and IT companies are now legally required to proactively intercept all digital communications.

For many Zambians, the law’s enactment was a shock. It was not publicly debated, and the first many heard of it was through the American embassy’s Facebook alert. The move is especially controversial given President Hichilema’s own past opposition to similar legislation. In 2021, while still in the opposition, he denounced a draft cyber law proposed by the previous administration, calling it a tool to stifle free speech and spy on citizens.

Opposition MP Miles Sampa openly criticized the president’s U-turn, asking in a viral Facebook post: “When did you change your position to now sign a law that bans nearly 100% of our ability to express ourselves online, without risking 25 years or even life in prison?” He continued, “With this new law, Mr. President, you might as well sign a state of emergency and suspend democracy altogether.”

Although the U.S. and Zambia have generally enjoyed warm relations under Hichilema’s leadership, the embassy’s warning reveals a growing unease. The American ambassador had recently voiced concerns over corruption within the Zambian government—a shift from earlier support. Now, Washington appears to be signaling that the country’s democratic trajectory is at risk, especially if the law is used to suppress dissent or undermine electoral transparency.

As Zambia heads toward a critical election year, the new cybersecurity law has become a lightning rod for political debate, civic anxiety, and international scrutiny—highlighting the fragile balance between digital security and civil liberties in an era of rising global surveillance.